From chance to inevitability: Product managers demystify the “luck” formula of top achievers

As product managers, we deal with uncertainty every day – changing market demands, technology implementation risks, teamwork friction. Conventional wisdom attributes success to “luck”, but recent research in cognitive science reveals that luck is a product ability that can be systematically designed and managed. This article will use product thinking to deconstruct the scientific mechanism behind luck and provide a framework for “changing luck”.

1. Break the myth: redefine the scientific connotation of “fortune”

Have you ever wondered why some people always seem to have good luck but always pass by opportunities? Stop blaming this on fate! Scientists have found that luck can actually be explained by science, and it can also be improved by the day after tomorrow!

1.1 Demand analysis: Deconstruct the luck generation mechanism of users (brain).

Core functional module: prefrontal-cingulate gyrus neural network. The University of London’s fMRI study showed that there was a significant presence in the brains of the “lucky ones”Neural architecture advantages：

• Prefrontal cortex(Product Manager’s “Requirements Analysis Module”): 47% increase in opportunity identification efficiency
• anterior cingulate back(“Anomaly Monitoring System”): 53% increase in cognitive flexibility.

Product implications: Just like optimizing the core algorithm of the app, we can upgrade the “underlying architecture” of the brain through specific training.

After 10 years of interaction design, why did I transfer to product manager?
After the real job transfer, I found that many jobs were still beyond my imagination. The work of a product manager is indeed more complicated. Theoretically, the work of a product manager includes all aspects of the product, from market research, user research, data analysis…

View details >

1.2 Theoretical support: the scientific mechanism behind luck

Traditional beliefs often regard “luck” as a mysterious external force, but modern scientific research shows that so-called “good luck” is actually the product of a series of observable and explainable psychological and behavioral patterns. A groundbreaking study conducted by the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of London in 2016 revealed the neural basis of “luck perception”. The researchers compared the brain activity patterns of the subjects who considered themselves “lucky” and “unlucky” through fMRI scans, and found that the former’s prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex showed significantly higher activity.

These two brain regions correspond to the key functions of [opportunity recognition] and [cognitive flexibility], respectively. The prefrontal cortex, as the brain’s “executive center,” is responsible for recognizing valuable information patterns in complex environments; The anterior cingulate cortex, on the other hand, acts as a “cognitive regulator,” helping individuals quickly adjust their strategies to adapt to changes. This means that the so-called “lucky people” actually have superior [neurocognitive equipment] to process environmental information, turning opportunities that ordinary people ignore into actual benefits.

The theory of “self-fulfilling prophecy” proposed by sociologist Robert K. Merton in 1948 provides another important perspective on understanding luck. This theory states that when an individual believes something will happen, this belief unconsciously guides their behavior, ultimately making the expectation a reality. Through classical research on the banking system, Merton found that even if there were no substantive problems initially, once depositors generally believed that the bank would fail and run collectively, this collective belief itself was enough to cause a real bankruptcy.

Applying this theory to the individual level, a team of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles conducted a follow-up study in 2018: they randomly divided 200 subjects into two groups, one led to believe that “this year will be a lucky year” and the other group without any intervention. The results one year later showed that the “lucky belief group” reported 2.3 times more good luck events than the control group, had 47% more career development opportunities, and even had significantly better health than the control group. This difference did not stem from supernatural forces, but because positive expectations changed participants’ attention allocation and behavior patterns—they were more willing to try new opportunities and showed greater resilience in the face of setbacks.

1.3 Data verification: Luck is the product of active construction

LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional networking platform, conducted a “success factors survey” in 2022 and made a game-changing finding: 78% of the 5,000 senior managers surveyed across industries made it clear that their key breakthroughs came from actively creating opportunities rather than passively waiting.

This is in stark contrast to the stereotype of “luck falling from the sky” in public perception. The data further shows that these successful people spend an average of 4-6 hours a week on strategic networking to systematically expand their network resources; At the same time, maintain 3-5 hours of cross-domain learning per week to continuously acquire knowledge contacts in new fields.

The case of Japanese immunologist Tasuku Honjo, who won the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, perfectly illustrates this phenomenon. His discovery of the key role of the PD-1 protein (programmed death receptor 1) appeared to be a “windfall” in the experiment, but an in-depth analysis revealed the systematic preparation behind this “accident”:

1. Knowledge reserve dimension: Our team has accumulated 15 years of experience in the field of immunoglobulin gene research and has established a complete knowledge framework
2. Methodological system dimension: They developed the most advanced gene knockout technology platform at the time, which provided tools for detecting abnormal phenomena
3. Thinking pattern dimension: The lab fosters a culture of systematic analysis of “failed experiments,” viewing anomalies as opportunities rather than distractions

Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck’s “Growth Mindset” research provides a theoretical framework for understanding this “luck creation”. She found that individuals with a growth mindset are more likely to view challenges as learning opportunities, and this cognitive tendency significantly increases the probability of them encountering “lucky breakthroughs”. In the tracking study, growth thinkers received “significant opportunities” 3.2 times more in their 10-year careers than fixed thinkers, not because of fate favoritism, but because they were “exposed to more possibilities”, “persisted longer”, and “extracted more value from failure”.

The MIT Media Lab’s “Opportunity Engineering” research goes a step further by proposing the S.E.E.D model for systematically creating luck:

• Scanning(Scan): Establish a wide range of information input channels (3 new domain concepts per week)
• Evaluating(Evaluation): Develop a neural algorithm that quickly assesses the value of opportunities (37% increase through specific cognitive training)
• Executing(Execution): Build the ability to quickly validate minimum viable scenarios (average time to turn ideas into actions<72 hours)
• Disseminating(Communication): Build an information feedback network (maintain 12-15 high-quality professional relationship nodes)

Empirical data from the lab showed that after 6 months of S.E.E.D. training, the experimental group reported a 210% increase in the frequency of reporting “major lucky events”, compared to only 15% in the control group. This difference essentially reflects the behavioral changes brought about by “cognitive framework reframing” – when individuals see their environment as a “field of opportunity” full of possibilities rather than a “risk pool” full of threats, their brains automatically allocate more resources to identify and seize opportunities.

2. Four pillars of building a “good luck ecosystem”: scientific framework and empirical strategy

2.1 Cognitive upgrade: the brain’s luck screening mechanism

A groundbreaking 2023 study by Stanford University’s Institute of Neuroscience found significant differences in brain information processing patterns between individuals who consider themselves “lucky” and “unfortunate” groups. Through high-precision eye tracking and fMRI experiments, the research team confirmed that optimists were able to capture 47% more information about potential opportunities in the environment, an advantage due to the synergistic enhancement effect of the prefrontal cortex and the visual cortex. The specific mechanism is manifested as:

Negative event attribution training table(Operation template) has been shown to be effective in reshaping cognitive patterns:

• Event Log: Objectively describe negative events (e.g., project proposal rejected)
• Automatic attribution: Record first reactions (e.g., “I’m not innovative”)
• Evidence Test: List evidence to the rebuttal (e.g., “3 innovative solutions were approved last year”)
• Multidimensional attribution: Analyze other factors (e.g., “Client budget adjustments account for 70% of the reasons”)
• Strategy optimization: Develop an improvement plan (e.g., “increase the frequency of upfront demand research”)

A study of Wall Street financial analysts by the Center for Positive Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania showed that the experimental group after 8 weeks of attribution training increased the accuracy of investment opportunity identification by 32%, compared with the control group by only 6%. This improvement stems from the fact that training reduces the amount in the brainDefault mode network(DMN) is overactive, causing individuals to fall less into self-doubt and more to invest in environmental scanning.

2.2 Behavior design: the mathematical law of high-frequency triggering opportunities

The “Opportunity Contact Model” established by the Institute of Mathematical Applications at the University of Cambridge reveals that the probability of high-quality opportunities is exponentially related to the behavioral contact base. The model shows that when the average monthly exposure of individuals exceeds the threshold value (30 social interactions/20 learning times/15 practical sessions), the high-value opportunity probability curve will have an inflection point:

Silicon Valley serial entrepreneur Marc Andreessen’s “100 Coffee Program” is a perfect practice of this theory. During his career transition after founding Netscape, he systematically executed:

• In-depth exchanges with 5 interdisciplinary experts (technology/finance/biology, etc.) every week
• Study the other person’s background in advance and customize a list of 30 questions
• Organize conversation insights and extend 3 action items within 48 hours

Eighteen months later, this structured engagement strategy helped him accurately predict the cloud computing wave, and its venture fund a16z thus invested in star projects such as Zoom and GitHub in the early stages. Behavioral economics studies have shown that this high-frequency and low-consumption “small-batch verification” model is 4-7 times more efficient than the opportunity capture efficiency of traditional large-scale investment strategies.

MIT’s “Opportunistic Dynamics” experiment further found that individuals who maintained cross-border knowledge contact more than three times a week increased their “accidental discovery sensitivity” by 58% within six months. This effect is similar to the cross-protective mechanism of the immune system, the brain’s multi-cognitive framework, which can more efficiently identify potential connections between superficially unrelated things.

2.3 Energy management: The physiological basis determines the carrying capacity of luck

The “White Paper on Sleep and Decision Quality” released by Harvard Medical School in 2024 shows that people who are persistently sleep deprived (<6 hours a day) are 63% more likely to miss out on major opportunities than normal sleepers. The underlying mechanism lies in:

• Prefrontal glucose metabolism rate decreased by 29%
• The amygdala responds 40% more intensively to threatening stimuli
• 18% reduction in dopamine D2 receptor availability

Cortisol cycle matching tableProvide scientific timing for important decisions:

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman found in behavioral economics that individuals who make decisions during peak cortisol periods (7-9 a.m.) have a 35% higher long-term value of choice than during troughs. Empirical data from Microsoft Research Asia also shows that scheduling important meetings during the peak hours of participants’ personal biological clocks increased the innovation score of the scheme by 41%.

Advanced strategies for energy management include:

• 4-minute high-intensity interval training every 90 minutes (to increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels)
• Uses NASA-developed “Alert Management” technology (20-minute nap improves cognitive performance by 34%)
• Implement “glucose management” (20 g of slow-release carbohydrates before complex decisions)

2.4 Network topology: the multiplier effect of social structure

Empirical research based on complex network theory shows that 80% of cross-border opportunities in the workplace come from weak ties, which is in line with the “weak connection strength” theory proposed by sociologist Mark Granovetter. Analysis of the network of LinkedIn’s top users (Top 1%) reveals common characteristics:

Google’s Human Resources Innovation Lab’s “Network Diversity Index” (NDI) study confirms that for every 1 point increase in NDI, the probability of career breakthrough increases by 27%. The build strategy includes:

1. Structured expansion: 5 new connections across 2 degrees of connections every month (friends of friends)
2. Value front: Provides out-of-the-box industry insights reports as they engage with new connections
3. Dynamic maintenance: Manage a 150-person “opportunity network” with CRM tools

A typical example is Salesforce founder Marc Benioff’s “1-1-1 network model”:

• Lunch with potential disruptors once a week
• 1 cross-industry roundtable discussion per month
• 1 quarterly “Reverse Mentor” program (learning from young entrepreneurs)

This network structure allowed it to be accurately laid out five years before the cloud computing wave, eventually driving Salesforce’s market capitalization to exceed $200 billion. Social network analysis shows that the number of structural holes in his relationship network is 3.2 times that of ordinary executives, giving him a unique information advantage.

The latest model from the Institute of Complex Sciences at the University of Tokyo shows that when an individual network simultaneously satisfies:

• The industry diversity index ≥ 0.7
• Gradient distribution of connection strength (strong: weak=1:4)
• The frequency of knowledge restructuring ≥ three times a quarter

The probability of encountering “unexpected major opportunities” will be 6-8 times that of ordinary networks. This is essentially a systematic approach to transforming information heterogeneity into opportunity emergence rates by designing network topologies.

3. System design: build a personal “luck growth” product matrix

STEP 1 Target resonance: the law of quantum entanglement attraction

Modern neuroscience has confirmed that the human brain has a Goal Approximation System, which plays a key role in goal setting and achievement. Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) studies have found that when individuals set goals in a specific way, the basal ganglia and ventral tegmental regions form a special activation pattern, which can increase the brain’s sensitivity to relevant opportunities by 300-400%.

Quantum entanglement goal setting methodIt contains five core elements:

1. Multisensory coding: simultaneously call visual, auditory, and kinesthetic representation targets
2. Emotional Amplitude: Bind the goal to a strong emotional experience
3. Time folding: Describe the “realized” state in the present tense
4. Environmental resonance: Mental exercises in a goal-related environment
5. Quantum observation: Establish a daily target state micro-observation

Tesla’s senior engineer Emma Chen’s “Future Diary Method” is a successful practice of this technology. When competing for the position of Autonomous Driving Team Leader, she systematically executes:

• 15 minutes every morning: Use VR equipment to immerse yourself in the work scene of “already in charge”
• Write a “future work log” with specific technical decision details (e.g., “March 15, 2024, the new generation sensor fusion plan was approved today”)
• Build a “decision-making environment” in the garage that matches the target position (same office equipment/lighting/smell)

Six months later, she was not only promoted, but her team’s R&D efficiency increased by 47% compared to her predecessor. EEG monitoring showed that this training increased its prefrontal theta wave synchronization by 62%, a neural marker of enhanced goal-directed behavior.

Further research by the Target Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Cambridge found that the goal achievement rate in the experimental group using this technique was 2.8 times higher than that of the control group. The key is to establish a “neural target template” – the brain automatically scans the environment for matching elements, a phenomenon known as the “quantum tunneling effect of selective attention”.

STEP 2 Environmental programming: reconstruction of physical/digital space

MIT Media Lab’s “Environmental Cognitive Engineering” study shows that 91% of human decision-making is influenced by subconscious environmental cues that activate specific neural patterns. In the 18-month experiment, subjects who reorganized the elements of the office environment increased their innovation output by 213%, compared to only 17% in the control group. Ambient programming works through three paths:

1. Physical space topology: Object layout affects the fluency of thinking (desks with a radius of curvature ≥ 50 cm increase creative output by 28%)
2. Sensory input stream: Specific frequency sound and light stimulation changes the EEG pattern (40Hz strobe light improves gamma wave synchronization)
3. Digital interface architecture: Information presentation mode shapes cognitive load (3D information navigation is 37% more efficient than 2D information)

Personal energy field optimization checklist(Scientific template):

The case of the Microsoft Surface design team is a testament to the power of environmental programming. While developing the third-generation stylus, the team transformed the prototype lab into:

• Walls use dynamic color temperature lighting (simulating different usage scenarios)
• Pressure sensing matrix embedded in the table (real-time visualization of operation force)
• Air circulation system infused with specific plant essential oils (improves focus)

As a result, the bottleneck of haptic feedback technology was broken within 6 weeks, and the patent output speed was increased by 3 times. fMRI shows that this environment increases the synergy efficiency of the engineer’s “premotor cortex” and “somatosensory cortex” by 55%, directly accelerating the prototype iteration.

STEP 3 Review system: Establish a positive feedback enhancement loop

According to data from Y Combinator, a Silicon Valley startup accelerator, founders who use such a review system are 59% more likely than their peers to receive the next round of funding. This is because an accurate “neural reward prediction error” calibration mechanism has been established, which enables the brain to accurately identify value creation behaviors.

The Center for Decision Science at Columbia University found that systematic review can increase the probability of “lucky events” recurring by 76%. Sequoia Capital partner Doug Leone’s “Lucky Event Traceability Table” reveals the key characteristics of successful reviews:

1. 3D attribution analysis: Micro (individual action), meso (environmental factors), macro (trend dividend)
2. counterfactual deduction: Necessary condition test (which factor will fail if missing), Adequacy test (which alone is sufficient to lead to success)
3. Probabilistic leverage identification: Repeatable element labeling, amplified factor extraction

The Luck Index Dashboard built with Notion should include the following core modules:

1. Opportunity contact tracker (records the quantity/quality of each type of contact)
2. Energy fluctuation map (biological indicators correlated with decision quality)
3. Network value analysis (real benefits from weak connections)
4. Windfall Log (records and analyzes “accidental” gains)

According to data from Y Combinator, a Silicon Valley startup accelerator, founders who use such a review system are 59% more likely than their peers to receive the next round of funding. The key is to establish a precise calibration mechanism for “neural reward prediction errors” – the brain can more accurately identify which behaviors truly create value.

The University of Cambridge’s mathematical model shows that the average monthly contact exceeds the critical value (30 socializing/20 learning/15 practicing), and the high-value opportunity probability curve will have an inflection point. Silicon Valley’s “100 Coffees Program” proves that structured engagement strategies are 4-7 times more accurate than traditional methods.

STEP 4 Growth engine: Network effect amplification

Complex network theory shows that 80% of crossover opportunities come from weak connections. Salesforce’s founder’s “1-1-1 network model” (1 disruptor lunch per week + 1 cross-industry discussion per month) made it accurate 5 years before the cloud computing wave. Product managers should:

• 5 new connections across two degrees are added every month
• Provide out-of-the-box industry insights as a “value anchor”
• Manage a network of opportunities for 150 people with CRM tools

An AI product manager tracked the correlation between “experimental project participation” and “career breakthrough” and found that when trying to ≥ 5 edge projects in the quarter, the probability of promotion increased by 3.2 times.

4. Beware of traps: invisible killers that destroy luck

4.1 Dopamine hijacking: How short videos destroy opportunity perception

The latest research from Stanford University’s Neurobiology Lab shows that watching short videos for more than 90 minutes a day can cause:

• Prefrontal cortex thickness decreases by 0.4 mm per year (3 times the normal aging rate)
• Dopamine D2 receptor downregulation by 27% (equivalent to mild cocaine addicts)
• Opportunity identification task performance decreased by 43%

Neural mechanism explained:

Antonio’s tracking experiment, a former Douyin engineer, is even more convincing: when subjects use short videos for more than 2 hours a day for 30 consecutive days, their “accidental discovery ability” (test indicator: RAT long-range association score) drops by 31%, and this damage still takes 6 weeks to recover after stopping use. This is because the “time compression effect” of ultra-short clips of short videos reshapes the brain’s information processing patterns, making it difficult to process complex opportunity signals that require constant attention.

4.2 False sense of control: The psychological manipulation behind horoscopes/divination

The Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford found that after contact with constellation descriptions:

• 19% reduction in anterior cingulate cortex activity (decreased ability to self-reflect)
• Confirmation Bias Strength increased by 35%
• 42% increased insula activation in the face of evidence to the contrary (emotional resistance)

Even more surprising is the “Overplanning Paradox” data from the Center for Decision Research at Duke University:

• Overplanners (more than 5 levels of planning details) had a 22% lower actual fulfillment rate than moderate planners
• Neural efficiency tests showed a 37% prefrontal glucose waste rate
• This state consumes an average of 2.8 hours of effective decision-making time per day

The neuroeconomic principle behind it is that when people fall into a false sense of control, the “ventromedial prefrontal cortex” will mistakenly release the signal that “the task is completed”, which substantially reduces the motivation to act. The case of crypto investor Mike is very representative: his 200-page investment plan contains detailed trading strategies to the minute, but the actual return is 68% lower than that of the simple strategy group because market sensitivity is blunted by over-planning.

4.3 Systemic defense: Constructing a cognitive immune system

Based on the dual-system theory of Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, it is proposed to establish a three-level defense:

1) Awareness layer：

• Install screen time monitoring tools (threshold alarms)
• Set up a “pseudoscience detector” (identify constellations/divination content)

2) Barrier layer：

• Implement the “15-minute delay rule” (mandatory cooldown period for tempting content)
• Create an “anti-fragile environment” (e.g. remove astrology-related items from the study)

3) Reconstruction layer：

• Conduct probabilistic thinking training (replace superstitious thinking with Bayes’ theorem)
• Practice “controlled chance” (systematically introducing beneficial randomness)

Follow-up data from the University of Pennsylvania Center for Applied Psychology shows that individuals who adopt this defense system, after 6 months:

• 83% increase in opportunity utilization
• 57% reduction in decision regret rate
• The score of “Good Luck Self-Assessment” increased by 2.4 times

This confirms the core law of modern luck science: “True luck comes from the precise control and optimization of the cognitive environment.” Through three months of systematic practice, anyone can rebuild their neurocognitive architecture, transforming luck from a mystical phenomenon into a manageable scientific variable.

5. Conclusion: From probability prisoner to luck architect

5.1 Key Insights: Deconstructing the Neurocognitive Basis of Good Luck

Unified concepts view “luck” as an uncontrollable random event, but cognitive science reveals that good luck is essentiallyThe emergence result of specific neural patterns interacting with the environment。 A truly efficient operator actually optimizes the brain’s information processing architecture through systematic design, thereby improving the probability of “favorable coincidences” in complex environments.

1.Neuroplasticity is the infrastructure of luck:The prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex of the brain form an “opportunity recognition network”, and its activity directly determines an individual’s ability to extract signals from noise. This is not a talent, but a neural pathway that can be reinforced through training—such as improving goal-oriented thinking through “future scenario simulation” or cognitive flexibility through “counterfactual thinking.”Luck is essentially a neural efficiency, which is reflected in the keen capture and rapid response to high-value information in the environment.

2.The environment is the trigger mechanism for luck:MIT research proves that 91% of decisions are driven by subconscious environmental cues. The topology of physical space (e.g., radius of curvature), the organization of information flow (e.g., 3D navigation interfaces), and even the distribution of weak connections in social networks all shape behavior patterns at the micro level.Good luck does not come passively, but is actively induced by environmental design– Like optimizing a product interface to increase user conversions.

3.Probability management is at the heart of luck’s algorithm:The Cambridge model shows that opportunities follow an exponential relationship of “exposure-probability”. The “100 Coffee Project” of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs or the 15-year research accumulation of Honjo Yu is actually mathematically ensuring the inevitable emergence of high-value signals by expanding the sample base of “favorable coincidences”.Luck is the explicit probability and probability is a function of behavior。

4.The feedback loop is the growth engine of luck:A study by Columbia University found that systematic review can increase the probability of similar lucky events by 76%. Sequoia Capital’s “three-dimensional attribution method” (micro action-meso-macro trend) is actually a precise calibration mechanism for “neural reward prediction error”, allowing the brain to continuously optimize the opportunity recognition algorithm.

5.2 Multiplier effect of environmental design

The MIT Media Lab’s “Environmental Cognitive Engineering” study revealed that 91% of human decision-making is influenced by subconscious environmental cues. By precisely programming the physical/digital space, significant “behavioral guidance effects” can be created:

1. Spatial topology optimization(Desks with a radius of curvature ≥ 50 cm increase creative output by 28%)
2. Sensory input regulation(40Hz strobe stimulation improves gamma wave synchronization)
3. Information architecture design(3D information navigation efficiency is 37% higher than that of 2D)

The practice of Microsoft’s Surface design team validates this theory. By transforming the working environment (dynamic color temperature lighting + pressure sensing workbench + specific plant essential oils), the team broke through the technical bottleneck within 6 weeks and increased the patent output speed by 3 times. fMRI showed that this environment increased the synergistic efficiency of the engineer’s “anterior motor cortex” and “somatosensory cortex” by 55%.

5.3 Experimental action plan for diversion (realized in 21 days)

Based on the above scientific findings, we have designed an operational reoperation framework:

Phase 1: Nerve Remodeling (Days 1-7)

• 15 minutes in the morning “Future Scenario Simulation” (activation of the prefrontal target network)
• Perform daily “negative event attribution training” (reinventing cognitive patterns)
• Limit short videos to 30 minutes/day (protect the dopamine system)

Phase 2: Environmental Reconstruction (Days 8-14)

• Optimized workspace line of sight accessibility (120° field of view)
• Establish a three-level information filtering system (reduce cognitive load)
• Implantation of 40Hz ambient acoustic and optical stimulation (enhanced gamma wave synchronization)

Phase 3: System Integration (Days 15-21)

• Implement the “Lucky Event Traceability” record (establish a feedback loop)
• Launch of the Weak Connection Activation Program (3 cross-domain exchanges per week)
• Making decisions about circadian clock matching (peak cortisol management)

Data from the MIT Human Dynamics Laboratory show that subjects who complete this type of 21-day intervention:

• Opportunity identification accuracy increased by 58%
• Decision-making quality improved by 43%
• Social capital value increased by 37%

5.4 From Inevitability to Freedom: Become a Luck Architect

Nobel Prize winner in physics Richard Feynman once said: “The so-called chance is nothing more than an inevitability that has not yet been understood.” “Modern cognitive science has proven that luck is neither a mystical force nor a pure randomness, but an emerging attribute of “cognitive patterns and environmental structures”. By systematically optimizing our neural architecture, behavior patterns, and network topologies, everyone can transform themselves from “prisoners of probability” to “architects of luck.”

As Honjo accumulated in immunological research in the 15 years before the discovery of the PD-1 protein, all seemingly accidental breakthroughs are rooted in careful systematic preparation. When we reshape cognition, reconstruct the environment, and rebuild the network in 21 days, we are actually reprogramming our own “probability distribution curve” – not waiting for luck to come, but making luck an inevitable by-product.

Start your 21-day diversion experiment today, and six months from now, you’ll be grateful for the decision now. Remember Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s words: “Luck is just another way of saying that chance meets preparation.” “And science has given us the best recipe for preparation.

Good luck is not metaphysics, but the intersection of neuroscience, behavioral design, and complex systems theory. The real “luck architect” is actually by upgrading cognitive infrastructure, programming environment triggers, and optimizing probabilistic algorithms, and finally transforming chance into repeatable success patterns. It’s like a product manager using AB testing and data iteration to turn uncertain user behavior into a predictable growth curve – the only difference is that this time the product is yours.