As the digital hub of production planning, the ERP system is designed to solve these problems at the root, and through data structuring, process automation, and cross-module collaboration, production planning can shift from “fire-fighting scheduling” to “predictive coordination”.
In the daily operations of manufacturing enterprises, production planning chaos is like a continuous “hidden storm”. A heavy machinery company once caused a production line worth 2 million yuan worth of parts to be misissued due to an incorrect BOM list, and finally had to stop work and rework, resulting in a direct loss of more than 500,000 yuan. Behind such problems, they often point to three core crux points: disorderly BOM management, inefficient manual order splitting, and lack of linkage mechanism.
BOM Management: Production Planning “Gene Bank” for ERP Systems
The BOM (Bill of Materials) is known as the “DNA of production planning”, and its data quality directly determines the accuracy of production planning. In ERP system design, the BOM management module is not a simple BOM entry tool, but a complex data system with multiple hierarchies, attribute associations, and version control.
Multi-level structured design is at the heart of the BOM module. Taking smartphone production as an example, its BOM can be divided into three levels: the finished product level includes the whole machine material, the component level covers the screen module, battery pack, etc., and the component level is refined to chips, resistors, etc. The ERP system associates the items at each level through coding rules to form a “parent-child” dependency. When the specifications of a component change, the system automatically prompts the associated components and finished products to avoid overall planning errors caused by local changes.
The attribute association mechanism solves the pain point of “incomplete material information”. In the ERP system, in addition to the basic attributes (e.g., name, specification), each item is also associated with process attributes (e.g., machining process, required equipment), procurement attributes (e.g., supplier, lead time), etc. When the production plan calls the BOM, the system can automatically extract these attributes to provide data support for subsequent task splitting and resource allocation. For example, if an auto part is marked with the “Heat Treatment Required” attribute in the BOM, the system automatically reserves a time window for the heat treatment operation when the production plan is generated.
To achieve these three challenges, product managers will only continue to appreciate
Good product managers are very scarce, and product managers who understand users, business, and data are still in demand when they go out of the Internet. On the contrary, if you only do simple communication, inefficient execution, and shallow thinking, I am afraid that you will not be able to go through the torrent of the next 3-5 years.
View details >
Version control functions are a “safety net” for BOM changes. The ERP system assigns a unique version number to each version of the BOM, recording the time, who, and reason for the change. When a production schedule references an older version of the BOM, the system alerts you immediately and displays the latest version difference.
Automatic order splitting: the production task of the ERP system “Smart dismantling machine”
The limitations of manual order splitting are obvious when order volume surges – a furniture company processes 500 orders per day with 3 planners during the peak promotion season, with a 12% error rate of splitting orders, resulting in frequent rework on the shop floor. The automatic order splitting function of the ERP system transforms manual decision-making into a reusable digital process through the optimization of the rules engine and algorithms.
Regular dismantling is the core logic of automatic order splitting. The ERP system allows enterprises to preset order splitting rules, such as “split by order priority”, “split by material availability”, “split by production floor capacity”, etc. When a production order containing 1,000 air conditioners enters the system, the system first checks the inventory materials, allocates 300 units with sufficient components to workshop A, and splits the 700 units waiting for the compressor to arrive to workshop B, and automatically adjusts the production sequence.
The task type differentiation mechanism realizes the accurate matching of production modes. The system will automatically classify tasks according to the “self-made/outsourced/assembly” attributes marked in the BOM: self-made parts (such as precision gears) are assigned to the corresponding processing workshop, outsourced parts (such as surface plating treatment) are pushed to the outsourcing management module to generate purchase orders, and assembly tasks are associated with the production line of the final assembly shop. This classification process avoids the low-level error of “outsourcing parts are misarranged to the self-made workshop”.
Deduplication and merging algorithms are the key to solving “duplicate production”. The ERP system will compare the issued tasks in real time during the order splitting process, and automatically merge quantities and adjust production batches when the production demand for the same material is found. For example, if two orders require 100 bearings of the same model, the system will combine them into 200 production tasks, avoiding the waste of equipment changeover caused by separate production
Linkage mechanism: the full-link “nerve conduction network” of the ERP system
The disconnection between production planning and procurement plan often leads to the contradiction of “on the one hand, raw material backlog, and production shortage on the other”. The design of the linkage mechanism of the ERP system is to build a real-time transmission channel of “production demand – procurement and supply” to achieve a seamless connection from task to resource security.
State-driven linkage is a core principle of system design. When a production task is issued, the ERP system will automatically check the inventory of the sub-parts in the BOM: if the inventory is sufficient, the picking list will be generated directly; If the inventory is insufficient, the purchase requirements are automatically generated based on the purchase attributes of the child parts, such as minimum order quantity, lead time. This “production-triggered procurement” mechanism avoids the lag of manual submission.
Cross-module data sharing breaks down “information silos”. The production planning module synchronizes data with the inventory module, procurement module, and workshop execution module in real time: the inventory module provides real-time availability, the procurement module feeds back the progress of materials in transit, and the workshop module returns the production progress. When a batch of raw materials arrives late due to suppliers, the system automatically adjusts the priority of related production tasks and pushes alternative material suggestions.
The visual scheduling platform realizes “global perceptibility”. The production dashboard of the ERP system displays key indicators such as order progress, material gaps, and equipment load in real time, and when there is an exception (such as a process delay of 20%), the system will be marked with a red warning and automatically calculate the impact on subsequent links. Planners can adjust the production sequence through drag-and-drop operations, and the system synchronously updates the procurement plan and workshop tasks. This visual scheduling makes complex production planning “touchable”.
The ultimate goal of ERP system design: to bring production planning to life
Good ERP system design is not a perfect plan for “zero errors”, but rather a flexible mechanism that can respond quickly to changes. The BOM management module ensures the accuracy of data sources, the automatic order splitting module improves the efficiency of task splitting, and the linkage mechanism ensures the synergy of the whole link – these three links support each other to form a closed loop of “data-process-collaboration”.
The practice of a heavy machinery group confirms this logic: through the ERP system to reconstruct the BOM system, optimize the order splitting algorithm, and establish a cross-departmental linkage mechanism, its production plan adjustment cycle has been compressed from 7 days to 1 day, the inventory turnover rate has increased by 40%, and the annual capital occupation cost has been reduced by 120 million yuan. This case reveals a core law: the essence of production planning is not to “formulate perfect instructions” but to “establish rules for dynamic balance.”
When choosing or designing an ERP system, there are three core questions to focus on: Can BOM data support multi-level production? Does the order splitting logic adapt to the order characteristics of the enterprise? Can the linkage mechanism cover the entire supply chain? Only when system design and production scenarios are deeply integrated can production planning break free from the “whirlpool of chaos” and truly become the engine that drives efficiency improvement.
